Skip to main content
Mayor of London logo London Assembly logo
Home

Search questions

Filter results

Asked of

Question by 1

  • Casey review and policing funded by Transport for London

    • Reference: 2023/1891
    • Question by: Siân Berry
    • Meeting date: 18 May 2023
    What follow-up work has Transport for London (TfL) carried out to check that specialist teams at the Metropolitan Police Service (MPS) which it funds, such as the Roads and Transport Policing Command (RTPC), have leadership, recruitment, vetting, training, culture and communications that support the standards the public should expect after the review by Baroness Casey?
  • Further data on grants awarded to obsolete homes

    • Reference: 2023/1892
    • Question by: Siân Berry
    • Meeting date: 18 May 2023
    Thank you for your answer to my question 2022/1007 and your recent oral answers to question 2023/1217. As I outlined in my follow-up questions during Mayor’s Question Time, for a total of 342 home grants in your original answer I have been unable to find any further information. This is because they are not owned by councils and housing associations are not covered by Freedom of Information legislation. Could you therefore now provide an update to the data in question 2022/1007, adding any new grant awards that have been made, and providing the data by provider rather than borough area...
  • Further detail on council home additions

    • Reference: 2023/1893
    • Question by: Siân Berry
    • Meeting date: 18 May 2023
    Could you provide a summary breakdown of the 23,000 council home starts described in your press release of 3 May 2022, showing for each year the total number of new starts, and the number within that total that is: a) new build starts that are replacements for demolition, b) new build starts that are not replacements for demolition, c) acquisitions purchased using Right to Buy back funding, d) acquisitions purchased through any other means, and e) other starts not in the categories above.
  • Kerbside parking and loading on red routes

    • Reference: 2023/1894
    • Question by: Siân Berry
    • Meeting date: 18 May 2023
    Could you provide data showing a full breakdown of the different uses of roadside parking and loading spaces currently on the Transport for London (TfL) red routes, including: a) the number of locations and number of spaces for each use, b) the number of locations and spaces that allow general parking with no charges, and c) any spaces that include electric vehicle charging facilities?
  • Healthy Streets checks for red routes

    • Reference: 2023/1895
    • Question by: Siân Berry
    • Meeting date: 18 May 2023
    Could you provide a list of all the Healthy Streets checks that have been carried out by Transport for London (TfL) on roads that include TfL red routes since the start of the delivery plan for the current Mayor’s Transport Strategy, detailing where necessary whether there are before and after checks available for completed or proposed improvement schemes? Could you also provide copies of the documentation for the results of each of these checks?
  • Reports on red route parking since 2018

    • Reference: 2023/1896
    • Question by: Siân Berry
    • Meeting date: 18 May 2023
    Could you explain why the most recent reports on red route parking spaces and revenue and PCNs issued and challenged on the Transport for London website (https://tfl.gov.uk/corporate/publications-and-reports/red-routes) is from 2018, and would you consider continuing to provide these updates even if transparency legislation from Government no longer requires it?
  • New pedestrian crossings on red routes

    • Reference: 2023/1897
    • Question by: Siân Berry
    • Meeting date: 18 May 2023
    How many new pedestrian crossings has Transport for London (TfL) delivered on red routes since May 2016? Could you provide this data by borough and year, and with individual location grid references, if this information is available?
  • Trusting the police with expanded ULEZ camera data

    • Reference: 2023/1838
    • Question by: Siân Berry
    • Meeting date: 18 May 2023
    Do you still think the Metropolitan Police Service (MPS) can be trusted to hold the data from the expanded Ultra Low Emission Zone (ULEZ) cameras, given the finding of the Casey Review that the MPS is institutionally racist, misogynistic and homophobic?
  • Right to Buy

    • Reference: 2023/1840
    • Question by: Siân Berry
    • Meeting date: 18 May 2023
    Do you agree with the Chartered Institute of Housing that, while the announcement that Local Authorities can keep 100 per cent of Right to Buy receipts for two years is welcome, the Government should also suspend the Right to Buy policy?
  • OPDC expenditure on Bill Amberg Studio

    • Reference: 2023/1244
    • Question by: Siân Berry
    • Meeting date: 23 March 2023
    Could you explain what Old Oak and Park Royal Development Corporation (OPDC) bought from the Bill Amberg Studio for £91,000 as per the P1-250-2022-23 spreadsheet on the report of all payments made by OPDC for value equal to or greater than £250 excl. VAT? [Reference: https://www.london.gov.uk/who-we-are/city-halls-partners/old-oak-and-pa…]