Search questions

• Reference: 2023/3589
• Question by: Siân Berry
• Meeting date: 14 September 2023

Thank you for your answer to my question 2021/4054. Could you update me on what work you have done since then to assess the problem of rent arrears in London, and to support tenants who find themselves facing eviction because of them?

• Reference: 2023/3590
• Question by: Siân Berry
• Meeting date: 14 September 2023

Could you tell me how many enquiries Transport for London (TfL) has received about increasing provision of bus services into London for housing developments located close to London and outside the boundary of the enlarged ULEZ, and from which areas?

• Reference: 2023/3591
• Question by: Siân Berry
• Meeting date: 14 September 2023

A constituent has contacted me via the London Assembly website to suggest the following question: “Noting the 2021 London Plan commitment to Green infrastructure (Policy G1) – ‘London’s network of green and open spaces, and green features in the built environment, should be protected and enhanced.’ – could you set out your expectation to London boroughs to reflect policies in the London Plan, so that land designated as local open green space should not be approved for housing development, and should be explicitly protected from housing development in Local Plans?”

• Reference: 2023/3592
• Question by: Siân Berry
• Meeting date: 14 September 2023

What support could you provide through your Culture and Community Spaces at Risk programme to the artists in Omega Works Warehouses in Haringey, who are facing eviction due to proposed redevelopment?

• Reference: 2023/3593
• Question by: Siân Berry
• Meeting date: 14 September 2023

The April 2022 report, Planning for Roof Mounted Solar Photovoltaics in London, commissioned by the GLA from Land Use Consultants (LUC), contained a number of recommendations to national government, the GLA, Historic England and London boroughs. Could you update me on the response you have received from all these bodies?

• Reference: 2023/3594
• Question by: Siân Berry
• Meeting date: 14 September 2023

The planning team at Transport for London (TfL) maintains the WebCAT online planning tool which gives Public Transport Access Level (PTAL) and Time mapping (TIM) for the Greater London area. However, all relevant data ceases at the GLA boundary making it unfit for purpose at the edges of London. Could this tool be expanded to show PTAL and TIM results beyond the GLA boundary?

• Reference: 2023/3595
• Question by: Siân Berry
• Meeting date: 14 September 2023

In the Transport for London (TfL) press release for the consultation on cycling services through the Silvertown Road Tunnel, it is claimed that these services will support a growth in cycling. The Director of Investment and Delivery Planning at TfL is quoted as saying: “These cross-river cycling proposals are a key part of our commitment to ensuring that the Silvertown Tunnel supports growth in cross-river cycling use.” What growth in cycling are you expecting from these services, and what is the baseline you are going to measure any growth from?

• Reference: 2023/3596
• Question by: Siân Berry
• Meeting date: 14 September 2023

When pressed to provide evidence for comments related to your leadership of Transport for London (TfL), the Department for Transport (DfT) said that scrutiny of TfL is a matter for the London Assembly. Given this, are you able to provide me with a complete dossier of information, including letters and other correspondence that would give a full account, in one place, of the negotiations with the Government on TfL funding deals since 2020?

• Reference: 2023/3597
• Question by: Siân Berry
• Meeting date: 14 September 2023

I was saddened to hear of the death of a woman cycling on Battersea Bridge from a collision with an HGV, whose driver failed to stop at the scene on 10 August 2023. Will Transport for London (TfL) be urgently reviewing the collision history and safety audit of every major bridge in London where HGVs are permitted, but there is no protected space for cycling and particularly where barriers at the side of the bridge may pose a crush risk?

• Reference: 2023/3598
• Question by: Siân Berry
• Meeting date: 14 September 2023

A constituent has contacted me concerned that pedestrian and cycling crossings are staying out of action for several days after they have been damaged by collisions from vehicles. For each year since 2018 could you provide: a) the number of crossings that have been taken out of action by a collision, b) the average number of days it took from collision to repair, c) the cost of repairing crossings so affected, and d) the costs recovered from those who caused the collision with the crossing?