Skip to main content
Mayor of London logo London Assembly logo
Home

Request for authorisation to settle a claim by a member of the public

Key information

Reference code: PCD 389

Date signed:

Decision by: Sophie Linden, Deputy Mayor, Policing and Crime

Executive summary

The Directorate of Legal Services (DLS) is requesting MOPAC agrees settlement of a claim against the MPS.

The Deputy Mayor for Policing and Crime has the discretion to authorise the settlement of legal proceedings where it would be conducive to the maintenance of an efficient and effective police force.

Recommendation

The MPS be authorised to settle the claim by an individual identified in the exempt part of this report.

Non-confidential facts and advice to the Deputy Mayor for Policing and Crime (DMPC)

1. Introduction and background

1.1. Part 2 of this Report is exempt because it falls within an exemption specified in para 2(2) of the Elected Local Policing Bodies (Specified Information) Order 2011 and/or under the Freedom of Information Act 2000, e.g. because the information amounts to personal data, is confidential or commercially sensitive.

1.2. The Claimant, a member of the public, has a claim for serious physical injury and psychiatric injury caused during his arrest in September 2014. An offer to settle has been made ahead of proceedings.

2. Issues for consideration

2.1. N/A

3. Financial Comments

3.1. Pursuant to the MOPAC Scheme of Consent and Delegation dated October 2016, MOPAC must authorise the settlement because it fulfils the criteria set out in section 4.10 of the Scheme including the financial level.

3.2. The proposed cost of the settlement can be met from within the DLS third party claims provision budget.

4.1. MOPAC has the power to pay any sum required in connection with the settlement of any claim made against the Commissioner under Section 88 of the Police Act 1996.

5. Equality Comments

5.1 To continue policing with the consent of the population it serves, the police will always seek to treat everyone fairly and openly. Equality issues do not appear to have relevance to this matter.

6. Background/supporting papers

• Exempt report


Signed decision document

Need a document on this page in an accessible format?

If you use assistive technology (such as a screen reader) and need a version of a PDF or other document on this page in a more accessible format, please get in touch via our online form and tell us which format you need.

It will also help us if you tell us which assistive technology you use. We’ll consider your request and get back to you in 5 working days.