Skip to main content
Mayor of London logo London Assembly logo
Home

Ingestion of Public Digital Media – Axon Citizen

Key information

Reference code: PCD 984

Date signed:

Decision by: Sophie Linden, Deputy Mayor, Policing and Crime

Executive summary

This decision seeks approval for a contract variation to adopt “Axon Citizen”, thereby enabling MPS staff to ingest and manage digital evidence from victims, witnesses and partners.

The MPS has a requirement to ingest and manage digital evidence from victims, witnesses and partners, before onward sharing across the Criminal Justice system, other UK Forces and partner agencies. It has several systems that enable sharing externally, particularly with corporations and the Crown Prosecution Service, but a solution to enable the ad hoc capture of video and photos often held on a victim’s or witnesses’ personal device or CCTV system is a requirement it has yet to deploy.

This decision recommends adoption of “Axon Citizen” to allow MPS staff to ingest any digital media evidence from any source without the need to physically dispatch officers to download evidence to DVDs, discs, USBs or require individuals to hand over their mobile phones.

It is an enhanced use of evidence.com, a system the MPS has been using to manage Body Worn Video media since 2016. That platform has since managed over 14 million media files (BWV, audio and CCTV). The sharing process is intuitive, seamless, secure and one its staff and partners in the Criminal Justice System are entirely familiar with.

Citizen would allow staff to send a text or email request from evidence.com via their tablet, laptop or desktop, or MPS smart phone to any victim or witness. With many new home (i.e. ring bell, nest or Blink) or vehicle CCTV systems directly linked to owners’ phones, the victim or witness can submit their digital evidence direct to the officer’s evidence.com account from their own cloud storage or mobile devices. The instructions for both the officer and member of the public are incredibly intuitive, taking a matter of a few minutes to complete a digital request / submission.

The deployment of Axon Citizen as part of the MPS’ enterprise license with the supplier will allow all staff to generate a text or email request from evidence.com to victims/witnesses, via their mobile device or desktop.

It is offered to the MPS as a variation to its existing Axon contract (which ends March 2023) and is fully funded from the MOPAC approved Digital Policing (DP) Innovation budget.

Recommendation

The Deputy Mayor for Policing and Crime is requested to approve the variation of the Axon contract to include the cost of “Axon Citizen”, enabling staff to digitally ingest multi-media evidence from victims / witnesses direct into the MPS core evidence.com digital platform. The total value of the variation, £847,000, will uplift the ceiling value of the current contract (running to March 2023) from £10,689,000 to £11,536,000. It is fully funded from the MOPAC approved Digital Policing Innovation budget.

Non-confidential facts and advice to the Deputy Mayor for Policing and Crime (DMPC)

1. Introduction and background

1.1. The MPS is building on the corporate digital strategy to be at the forefront of 21st century policing in the way the MPS prevent, solve crime and digitally engage with its Communities and partners.



1.2. There is an ever-increasing availability of digital media evidence from victims and witnesses, including from mobile phones and other personal devices, public and privately-owned CCTV systems, in car DASH cams as well as helmet cams on motorcycles and cyclists. The advances in this technology have been exponential and with other agencies’ growing adoption of BWV (e.g. the LAS, TFL, Prisons, Hospitals and in the private security industry), there is growing demand on the MPS to dispatch officers to download, collect and manage the resultant digital evidence in a timely manner.

1.3. Evidence is currently downloaded to and collected via DVDs, discs, pen drives or USBs. The MPS has a requirement to reduce the need to physically send officers to collect this media, but instead to digitally ingest and manage the evidence from victims of crime, witnesses and partners, before onward sharing across the wider Criminal Justice System and to other stakeholders. That need has become even more evident in these social distancing times.

1.4. Files need to be ingested into an MPS Digital Evidence Management System, in line with its Cloud first principles. This must entail using a process that is seamless and secure for all MPS users as well as members of the public and partner agencies. Once uploaded there is a further requirement for the media to be categorised for retention under the principles of Management of Police Information, given Identifiable reference names or numbers or evidence titles, so that it can be easily identifiable, searchable and if required, grouped into case evidence. This back-end digital evidence management system and the workflows and processes to use it have to be seamless, secure and auditable.

1.5. The MPS’s Strategic Document ‘Keeping London Safe, Our Strategy 2018/25’ supports this business need for a public ingestion solution and sets the tone for a digitally connected Police Service with the MPS harnessing data and digital technology to become a world leader in policing, rising to the challenge of a fast moving data-driven digital age. The MPS recognises that siloes and separated systems and their associated business processes and supporting staff are in themselves blockers for change, limiting staff in their daily work while lengthening manual and digital business processes which often result in a number of support staff required to accomplish basic digital content alterations.

1.6. The MPS Strategic Digital Direction is to be able to not only ingest public digital media but also to onward share this evidence with the CPS. It now uses evidence.com to share 999 audio tapes, ABE (Achieving Best Evidence) interviews and small numbers of other public generated digital media such as CCTV or mobile phone footage. However, officers have to “import” this media into the system from other MPS systems which involves additional workflows and the functionality is limited to import maximum file sizes of 4GB.

2. Issues for consideration

2.1. The MPS have been testing Axon Citizen on the North Area (NA) BCU and with selected Specialist Crime Teams since July 2020. Summary of that trial:

• North Area and specialist Crime Teams BCU officers have used Citizen and ingested 3,500 pieces of media to date, with monthly increases of an initial 36 in July 2020, 161 in August to now 650 in March.

• It is estimated that current processes can take one officer anything up to 3 hrs to manage one piece of physical media (i.e. disc, DVD). Travelling to the member of the public, downloading evidence, booking it into Police storage facilities, making copies, onward sharing and transporting it to the CPS, Defence and Courts.

• Cumbria Constabulary went live with Citizen in 2018. They only have 1,000 officers, much lower crime levels than recorded by the MPS and therefore not as many sources of digital media as the MPS will have in London. However, they still ingested over 20,000 media files into evidence.com using Axon Citizen in 2020.

• What used to take hours or even days depending on a victim or witness availability to provide the hard media, now only takes but a few minutes.

2.2. Based on the above figures it is estimated that that the MPS could free up 27,000 staff days in potential officers resource savings per annum.

3. Financial Comments

3.1. This enhancement to Axon’s software as a service costs £847,000 over the remaining two years of the Axon contract and will be fully funded out of the MPS Digital Policing’s Innovation Budget.

4.1. There are no known Commercial barriers – with MPS Legal Services agreeing that an enhanced use of evidence.com in this way was “foreseeable” in that the Statement of Requirements (SOR) used during the procurement and tendering process for BVW and evidence.com included a “public ingestion” requirement. Up until this point this the functionality that evidence.com already has available has not been leveraged, but as part of the managed software as a service contract, this is now available to all staff.

4.2. MOPAC is a contracting authority as defined in the Public Contracts Regulations 2015 (PCR 2015). All awards of public contracts for goods and/or services valued at £189,330 or above must be procured in accordance with the Regulations. This report confirms the proposed contract modification exceeds this value. Accordingly, the Regulations will be engaged.

4.3. The required services were included in the scope of the existing contract, however the value of the contract does need to be increased to include the additional cost of deploying the service. Under Regulation 72(1)(b) of the PCR 2015 a contract may be extended by up to 50% of its original value for interoperability or incompatibility reasons where it would cause significant inconvenience or substantial duplication of costs to change the supplier.

4.4. In this case, the functionality of Axon Citizen is embedded within the Axon ecosystem and platform (evidence.com) and any other application (even if one could be provided by another supplier) would not be compatible with the MPS’s existing, hardware, processes and procedures. It would be very costly/technically impossible for MPS to switch to a new platform, or use two different evidence platforms in tandem. When applying regulation 72 MOPAC/MPS should publish a modification notice in Find a Contract and OJEU under regulation 72(3).

4.5. The MPS Commercial Team will publish a Modification Notice through the usual portal once approval is granted.

4.6. Accordingly, a contract variation will be compliant with the PCR 2015.

4.7. Paragraph 4.13 of the MOPAC Scheme of Delegation and Consent provides the DMPC has delegated authority to approve all unforeseen variations and extensions to contracts with an original value of £500,000 or above, when the variation or extension is greater than 10% of the original value and/or is for a period of more than 12 months.

4.8. Paragraph 7.26 of the Scheme provides the Director of Strategic Procurement has consent to sign all contracts, irrespective of value, once they have been properly approved, except for those which are required to be executed under the Common Seal of MOPAC.

5. Commercial Issues

5.1. As this is an extension to an existing service, i.e. the use of Axon’s Evidence.com platform that the MPS have been using since 2016, this does not change any aspects relating to responsible procurement.

5.2. There were three potential ‘route to market’ options available for the procurement of the solution:

• Option A: Procuring a new call off contract via a mini competition from the Lot 2 of the EMSCU-DPS Body Worn Video Framework;

• Option B: (Recommended) issue a change control notice from the current body worn video contract with Axon;

• Option C: Procuring Axon Citizen via a new call off contract by applying an evaluation and down select procedure from the G Cloud 12 Framework managed by Crown Commercial Services.

5.3. Axon Citizen is digital ingestion functionality available within evidence.com but not activated, as part of the initial contract for body worn video managed service. The Body Worn Contract provides a fully integrated service that includes cameras, firmware and settings management, transmission of the captured content back into the evidential management service and then a full evidential treatment solution. Third party systems can interface with the Axon infrastructure but this would not be an acceptable substitute as no other third party could provide the seamless & secure interoperability essential to an end-to-end managed service, that already exists to the standards currently utilised.

5.4. The MPS have sufficient evidence to meet both:

• Regulation 32 of the PCR 2015. Under this exemption, the MPS may award a new contract without undertaking a competition, if competition is absent for technical reasons. Axon have exclusive rights with IPR in the end to end service including firmware and settings management, transmission of the captured content back into the evidential management service, redaction, clipping and secure sharing of data with CPS, Defence, Judiciary.

• Regulation 72 of the PCR 2015. Under this regulation, MPS may extend their existing contract by up to 50% where there are technical (incompatibility and interoperational) reasons and inconvenience/duplication of costs reasons. MPS have previously extended this contract, however subsequent modification is permitted under Regulation 72(2), provided each modification is not for more than 50% of the original value of the contract and MPS are not varying the contract in order to deliberately avoid undertaking a new procurement.

5.5. However, as digital ingestion of media is included in the existing contract, use of Regulation 72 (varying the existing contract to increase the contract value) allows MPS to benefit from additional discounts on licensing costs from the existing enterprise model license agreement. Therefore, application of regulation 72 is the most suitable regulation in this case.

5.6. There is a further argument that the contract as originally procured included this service in its scope. The Statement of Requirements (SOR) used during the procurement and tendering process for BWV and evidence.com included a “public ingestion” requirement. The MPS has not leveraged this functionality that is embedded with the current evidence.com solution. Therefore, the risk of challenge from any other supplier is deemed to be a low risk.

5.7. Additional information is contained in the restricted section of the report.

5.8. Value for Money: Based on trial figures outlined above, and other Force users who have deployed this solution, it is estimated that fully taking advantage of the technological benefits Citizen provides could free up numerous staff hours, so as to be able to deploy them to other frontline duties, i.e. visible policing. Additional information is contained in the restricted section of the report’.

5.9. The MPS uses a Digital Evidence Management System, “evidence.com” that can manage the media once it is retrieved. It is tried and proven and enables a single means of sharing evidence with the CPS and other partners, and one which staff are already conversant with as evidenced by over 30,000 digital shares a month using this method.

5.10. The CPS have been involved in the MPS Citizen trial since 2020 and are advocates of its adoption as it also provides their staff one effective means of receiving digital media through evidence.com from the MPS, in the same manner as they do currently with Body Worn Video footage.

5.11. The CPS have cited issues with alternative products for ingesting media, not only with issues and challenges with the sharing of evidence between them and the force, but real difficulties in being able to onward share any evidence with the defence in a seamless manner. Evidence collected through Citizen will not be subject to those challenges.

5.12. Using a separate evidence management system will encompass an additional way of doing things for MPS staff and Partners and necessitate business change at an increased cost to the MPS. There has been a successful trial that shows Citizen works, with officers commenting on its ease of use and contribution to more effective investigations.

5.13. Citizen is intuitive to use and can be switched on MPS-wide and available for all staff with minimal training. It works through evidence.com of which MPS staff already have accounts and are familiar with, especially if in a front-line role.

5.14. There are no additional data storage costs as this is already included in the existing AXON contract for media held in evidence.com.

6. GDPR and Data Privacy

6.1. The MPS is subject to the requirements and conditions placed on it as a 'State' body to comply with the European Convention of Human Rights and the Data Protection Act (DPA) 2018. Both legislative requirements place an obligation on the MPS to process personal data fairly and lawfully in order to safeguard the rights and freedoms of individuals.

6.2. Under Article 35 of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and Section 57 of the DPA 2018, Data Protection Impact Assessments (DPIA) become mandatory for organisations with technologies and processes that are likely to result in a high risk to the rights of the data subjects.

6.3. The Information Assurance and Information Rights units within MPS will be consulted at all stages to ensure that Axon Citizen meets its compliance requirements.

6.4. A Data Protection Impact Assessment (DPIA) [formerly Privacy Impact Assessment (PIA)], is already in place for the use of evidence.com. An additional DPIA for the use of Citizen has been completed and submitted and this is currently with MPS Data Protection Officer for sign off. This will ensure a privacy by design approach, which will allow the MPS to find and fix problems at the early stages of any project, ensuring compliance with GDPR. DPIAs support the accountability principle, as they will ensure the MPS complies with the requirements of GDPR and they demonstrate that appropriate measures have been taken to ensure compliance.

7. Equality Comments

7.1. The adoption of new technology in this way can only have a positive impact on diversity and equality. It will afford community members the opportunity to digitally share footage, rather than invite officers to their homes or the workplaces, or vice versa, require them to attend a Police building and temporarily hand over their mobile devices, which can be a considerable inconvenience to those who rely on them. These can be seen as actual barriers to effective communication between Police and communities, especially those from diverse backgrounds. An adoption of this technology will improve communication and increase confidence in Policing.

8. Background/supporting papers

8.1. MPS Part 1 paper.

Signed decision document

PCD 984 Ingestion of Public Digital Media Axon Citizen

Need a document on this page in an accessible format?

If you use assistive technology (such as a screen reader) and need a version of a PDF or other document on this page in a more accessible format, please get in touch via our online form and tell us which format you need.

It will also help us if you tell us which assistive technology you use. We’ll consider your request and get back to you in 5 working days.