Skip to main content
Mayor of London logo London Assembly logo
Home

Financial Assistance granted for representation of officer at Inquiry

Key information

Reference code: PCD 1056

Date signed:

Decision by: Sophie Linden, Deputy Mayor, Policing and Crime

Executive summary

Executive Summary:

The Deputy Mayor for Policing and Crime (DMPC) is asked to consider an application to increase the cap in respect of financial assistance already granted and made by the Applicant for continued separate representation at a public inquiry. The application is for a cap increase in the sum of £43,500.00 (excluding VAT). This is the third application in this matter. The initial application was for £152,900.00 (excl VAT). An application for a CAP increase in the sum of £134,300.00 (excl VAT) (PCD 971) was approved on 19 March 2021. This is the second application for an increase to the CAP, for the sum of £43,500 (excl VAT). This brings the total sum to £330,700 (excl VAT),

The DMPC has power to grant the application for a cap increase in the sum of £43,500.00 (excluding VAT) if she is satisfied that funding the Applicant’s legal expenses in the proceedings is likely to secure an efficient and effective police force.

Recommendation

The Deputy Mayor for Policing and Crime (DMPC) is asked to consider an application for cap increase in the sum of £43,500.00 (excluding VAT), for a serving officer in respect of separate representation at an inquiry. This is the 3rd application made by the Applicant.

The Deputy Mayor for Policing and Crime has the discretion to authorise financial assistance for police officers/staff where it would be conducive to the maintenance of an efficient and effective police force.

Non-confidential facts and advice to the Deputy Mayor for Policing and Crime (DMPC)

1. Introduction and background

1.1. Part 2 of this Report is exempt because it falls within an exemption specified in para 2(2) of the Elected Local Policing Bodies (Specified Information) Order 2011 and/or under the Freedom of Information Act 2000, e.g. because the information amounts to personal data, is confidential or commercially sensitive.

1.2. These proceedings concern the representation of a serving police officer, at Public Inquiry proceedings. This is the 2nd application for an Increase to the CAP.

1.3. The Applicant represents that they satisfy the criteria for entitlement to financial assistance namely: that they were performing their official duties; that they were acting in good faith, and that they exercised reasonable judgement. The facts provided by the Applicants in support of their representation for financial assistance are set out in the exempt report.

1.4. The Commissioner’s position in relation to the Applicants representations for financial assistance are also set out in the exempt report.

2. Issues for consideration

2.1. For the DMPC to consider whether there is a conflict of interest requiring separate representation and financial assistance and whether the financial assistance will secure an efficient and effective Police Service.

3. Financial Comments

The cost of these legal fees, if authorised, will be met from the 1996 Police Act Expenditure budget within the MPS Directorate of Legal Services’ budget.

4.1. The DMPC has a discretion under Section 3(6) and para. 7 of Schedule 3 of the Police Reform and Social Responsibility Act 2011 to fund police officers’ legal expenses in proceedings if they consider that providing the funding secures the maintenance of an efficient and effective police force. The Deputy Mayor has delegated authority, under para. 4.9 of the Scheme of Delegation, to consider the current application for financial assistance.

4.2. A conflict of interest arises between the Commissioner and the police officers which gave rise to the need for separate representation and financial assistance for the reasons set out in the exempt report

4.3. Home Office Circular 010/2017 provides guidance which applies to MOPAC. In conclusion it states:

4.4. “…police officers and staff must be confident that local policing bodies will provide financial assistance, whether in full or part, for officers facing legal proceedings where they have acted in good faith and have exercised their judgement reasonably”.

5. GDPR and Data Privacy

5.1. The processing of personal data has been minimised as part of this decision and is held within Part 2 of the report.

6. Equality Comments

6.1. To continue policing with the consent of the population it serves, the police will always seek to treat everyone fairly and openly. Race or equality issues do not appear to have an impact in this matter.

7. Background/supporting papers

7.1. Refer to Part 2 of the report.

Signed decision document

PCD 1056 Financial Assistance cap increase Inquiry

Need a document on this page in an accessible format?

If you use assistive technology (such as a screen reader) and need a version of a PDF or other document on this page in a more accessible format, please get in touch via our online form and tell us which format you need.

It will also help us if you tell us which assistive technology you use. We’ll consider your request and get back to you in 5 working days.