Skip to main content
Mayor of London logo London Assembly logo
Home

London's Infrastructure and Levelling Up

Key information

Date: Thursday 06th July 2023

Time: 09:00am

Motion detail

Sakina Sheikh AM moved, and Elly Baker AM seconded the following motion: 

“This Assembly notes the importance of infrastructure for London’s economy and quality of life.

Good infrastructure not only benefits London businesses choosing to locate here, choosing to invest here, choosing to create jobs in the capital, but this investment also creates employment in other parts of the UK. This Assembly does not believe the Government’s Levelling Up policy should be of detriment to London. When London sees a reduction in investment in infrastructure, other parts of the UK suffer the consequences too. When London’s economy thrives, so does the UK economy.

This Assembly notes the cross-party House of Commons Levelling Up, Housing and Communities Committee’s findings that levelling up is failing to address regional economic inequality because funding was only for short-term initiatives, and there is a lack of transparency with allocations of funding.

This Assembly agrees with Sir John Armitt of the National Infrastructure Commission that there should be further devolution of funding from central Government to devolved authorities. This would enable a consistency and certainty of financial support and allow for longer-term infrastructure planning. This includes moving away from short-term emergency settlements for Transport for London (TfL) to a more stable settlement that allows longer-term planning.

This Assembly calls for more Government investment to support major infrastructure. This includes:

  • longer term funding of TfL and a reinstatement of the £700 million annual operating grant removed by Boris Johnson when Mayor in 2015;
  • further devolution to London, including money raising powers;
  • a commitment that Levelling Up the rest of the UK is in addition to supporting London’s economy and not at the expense of investment in London’s infrastructure.”

Following debate and upon being put to a vote, the motion was agreed with 16 votes being cast in favour, and 6 votes being cast against.

Response to motion

Department for Transport Response to Motion

Need a document on this page in an accessible format?

If you use assistive technology (such as a screen reader) and need a version of a PDF or other document on this page in a more accessible format, please get in touch via our online form and tell us which format you need.

It will also help us if you tell us which assistive technology you use. We’ll consider your request and get back to you in 5 working days.